Participatory Action Research Essay

The youth class was started in 2004 after the youths realized nearlything was going harm in the friendship and they were the right people to objurgate the situation. They then came unitedly and registered with the Ministry of Culture and Social go Youth Affairs. Its a non-profit making organization whose purpose is to address the of necessity of the youths and to improve the live standards of the community. The chemical assort brings unneurotic youths of both genders and has no heathen or racial barriers as it believes youths from whatever compass experience the same problems and must come together in order to crop them.Majority of the youths atomic number 18 trained in various fields of tuition and so its a pool of amend young men and women committed to be variety bring uprs in other peoples lives. presently the congregation has thirty five fully registered and mobile members but there is room for more members to wedlock them. Since its formation, the gat heringing has provided their voluntary go beyond region of operation to improve the well being of the community.Their areas of activities embroil youths and community mobilization and awareness on human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS, Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs), guidance and counseling services, training on income generating activities, youth and community education on alcohol and drug abuse, education on leaders and administration, planning and accountability, tree planting exercise and crack voluntary services for the well being of the community. The group is seeking to address the most pressing privations that are affecting them and the community where they are living.These pressing need collaborative efforts as they cannot be solved by the community alone as they need technical expertise and somewhat substantial funding. These inescapably were prioritized according to their impact in the community and they accommodate the gamy unemployment rate among the youth, gender disparity repay subject to the culture, and idleness among the youths leading to irresponsible youth behavior, high infection rate of AIDS and other venereal diseases, drug abuse, poor farming methods leading to victuals insecurity and afforestation problem..The members agreed that they had the brains, knowledge and skills and if put together and shared leave bring a epic change among the group members, other youths and the community at large. Though they founder had challenges especially from the elderly community members when discussing on sexual issues, the group is committed to keep back influenceing until they have attained their set objectives. Their services to the community have effected some cocksure changes, which have commended by the community members. The group to a fault works with other major stakeholders who have been face-saving to the group in terms of training and monetary support.These include the Community Based Organizations, Non-Governmenta l Organizations, Religious Organizations, edict and the Government to improve the living standards of the community. These stakeholders have been rattling helpful to the youth group because they have been go training without charging them any fee, giving the youths some incentives as well as the community and funding their projects at some level. They have been able to work with the group since it was started and have promised they will continue working with them as long as keep the agreement with them.The practical inquiry interrogative mood that could be answered if the investigator collaboratively worked the major stakeholders is to mother out whether their input into the group has had and dogmatic impact to the youth group and to the community. This research question will be a guide to acquiring some critical information which will be used by the group to improve on the areas that they are not performing well (The research question could be as quest fors What has been your input to the group and has it had any impact to the group and to the society? )The benefits of doing the work the research worker is proposing is that it could again help the group to be able to identify their weakness and then find out solutions for them. It will also open other door for them to meet other partners through the researcher who will pump in some more useful input to the group. Through their interaction with them some critical issues may rise which could not have been solved, but it will be an opportunity to solve them.In one way the group could be advertising or selling itself and what they are task through these formal discussions as the contents of the discussions will be published somewhere, which will get some support for the group. This could be beneficial to the group and to the researcher as he/she will be able to learn more about how groups work. As concerns to the respectable issues, the protocol has to be followed and the group has to be consulted prototypal before anything happens.There should be respect for the group and any information about the group should be kept secret as it is. The researcher should make sure that he/she work within the guidelines of the group and should she/he need any information should follow the right channels but not go to public and tell the public about the group against their wishes References Luft, J (1984). An Introduction to Group Dynamics (3rd Edition). spate View, CA Mayfield Toseland, R& Rivas, R. (2005) Introduction to Group Practice, Allyn & Bacon. brisk York.